Course Links
Michigan Links
|
|
Explorations in Mathematics - Possible Projects
The class will be split into small groups, preferably 3 students
but sometimes 2, who will select projects and work on them.
During the semester, at
least three lab projects must be completed by each group.
Suggestions for projects will be added to the following list during the semester.
Descriptions of some of the possible projects:
The projects which have already been taken:
Project number 1
- Continuous blackjack:
Pdf or
LaTeX
(Alice Shen, Anthony Widjaja, Yuan Xiang; Mentor: Scott Schneider)
- IRS: Pdf or
LaTeX (Bilal Bazzy, Kibichii Chelilim, Jacob
Timkovich; Mentor: Alex Cope)
- Random Walks : Pdf or
LaTeX
(Adam Cai, Xander Flood; Mentor: Jeff Lagarias)
- Coloring Knots:
Pdf or
LaTeX
(Joseph Richey, Qingzhao Shi; Mentor: Wei Qian)
Project number 2
- Tossing a Coin: Pdf or LaTeX
(Alice Shen, Anthony Widjaja, Yuan Xiang; Mentor: Jeff Lagarias)
- Decimal Expansions:
Pdf or LaTeX
(Bilal Bazzy, Kibichii Chelilim, Jacob
Timkovich; Mentor: Alex Cope)
- Gluing the Edges of a Polygon: Pdf or LaTeX
(Adam Cai, Xander Flood; Mentor: Wei Qian)
- Primes Congruent to 1 Modulo 4 p:
Pdf or LaTeX (Joseph Richey,
Qingzhao Shi; Mentor: Scott Schneider)
Project number 3
- Billiards:
Pdf
(Alice Shen, Anthony Widjaja, Yuan Xiang; Mentor: Jeff Lagarias)
- Random Matrices: Pdf or LaTeX
(Bilal Bazzy, Kibichii Chelilim, Jacob
Timkovich; Mentor: Alex Cope)
- Points on Conics Modulo p: Pdf or LaTeX
(Adam Cai, Xander Flood; Mentor: Scott Schneider)
- Eigenvalues of the Fourier Matrix: Pdf or LaTeX (Joseph Richey,
Qingzhao Shi; Mentor: Wei Qian)
Advice on choosing your topics
Teams may choose their topics, but approval from staff is required. This is mainly to avoid too much repetition.
A project will have several parts:
- Implementation of the necessary algorithms on the computer
or by hand,
- Collection of data,
- Analysis of the data,
- Preparation of a project report, first in draft form,
followed by revision into final form,
- An oral report to the class.
Discussion:
- Part 1.
- The implementation will often require writing some programs for the computer.
You may use standard software packages such as Maple, Mathematica, Matlab, or C++.
- Parts 2,3.
- In practice, the collection of data and its analysis go hand in hand.
The topics have been chosen because they exhibit interesting phenomena that ask for explanation.
Often those phenomena will not be apparent until some experiments are made, and then
you may want to do other experiments to refine your understanding of the perceived regularities.
Your conclusions should be stated in precise mathematical terms as conjectures, or as theorems
if you can find proofs. Proofs will be looked upon with favor, but are not required.
Plausibility arguments may also be given.
For some of the projects, relevant material can be found in the literature.
Please obtain permission of the staff ahead of time if you wish to consult
the literature. In general, it will be much more satisfying for you if you
explore your topic experimentally before
doing so. References to the literature will not replace your
obligation to (1) document your discovery of the phenomena, and (2)
explain the underlying mathematics clearly.
- Part 4.
- A project report should have the following parts:
- an outline of the project and of the conclusions drawn,
- a description in words of the computer implementation, with
attention to any problems that arose,
- (the body of the report) a discussion of the results of the
experiments and of the conclusions,
- an appendix including summaries of data and computer programs.
It may be appropriate to combine parts (b) and (c).
- Part 5.
- Each group will give an oral presentation to this class once or
twice during the semester. We will help each group individually prepare for this.
Your report must make explicit acknowledgement to the literature you
consult, and to any help you receive from people other than teammates
and course staff.
Grading:
The course grade will be based (a) on the quality of
the project work and (b) on the quality of the written and oral
reports, weighted approximately equally.
|